Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Cory Clarkson on April 13, 2014 at 7:14am

i think they all look good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ulf Degrell on April 13, 2014 at 8:25am

Thanks Cory!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on April 13, 2014 at 1:35pm

They don't look good to me. I have been a Kiss collector for over 35 years and have hundreds of autographs, a lot in person. The Gene and Paul are definitely not right,so I would leave it alone!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ulf Degrell on April 14, 2014 at 3:05am

Thank you Richard, great to learn from the experts

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Terry Everton on April 14, 2014 at 1:00pm

Here's a PSA/DNA (F62523) Gene of mine for comparison...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brian on April 14, 2014 at 2:24pm

I'm not an expert and I don't have any Kiss autographs from 2000, but these look off from all the ones I've gotten in person over the last 4 years. Might be worth paying Roger for his expert opinion if you're thinking of buying it. I'd stay away from it unless you get his blessing.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on April 14, 2014 at 4:57pm

this is really awful in my opinion

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ulf Degrell on April 15, 2014 at 12:05pm

Many thanks to all of you. I will stay away from this one

• ▶ Reply