We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Any opinions on these two photos would be much appreciated. The Leo pic seems fairly old, is in a second-rate state and appears to have had "To Kim" rubbed off it, so I'm hoping it's a genuine early autograph.... Thanks in advance.

Views: 1737

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Personally I don't like either signature but others may know more about signatures when they were younger. This looks similar to fakes I've seen being sold by Memorabilia Ink

Thanks Dan, so much for the UACC COA on the Titanic one... yes I saw one at Memorabilia Ink on eBay and it is similar. Still hopeful for the Leo one though.

sorry to piggyback off this thread.

but in regards of  kate...

how is this   kate winslet?  autograph.

The Titanic piece is garbage, the Leo is likely real as long as it isn't a print.

The Winslet head shot looks good, again as long as it isn't a print.

DiCaprio then to now.....

this devolved into 

and finally to ....

Thanks Pete, my Leo one is definitely not printed. I have seen a couple of other similar (but different) ones on google images which claim to be authentic. Good enough for me... :)

This looks like the preprint that was sent out for a while by her UK agent a few years ago

yeah, the one i posted is a reprint. shame.

H Michelle id like to see your uma t autograph.

Sorry to use the same thread, but do you guys think this one is real?
Attachments: No photo uploads here

Hi, these are ones that I got IP so mine are 100% real.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service