We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hello

i bought this Signed Invincible Cover by Michael Jackson
What do you think it looks good ? your opinion ?

I have already used 2 quick opinions
Once by Roger Epperson
Result: Looks fine to me
and once from Beckett
Result: Likely to Pass full Authentication

Thanks :)

Views: 1885

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't like it, not authentic imo.

Hi Ivo, Looks like you pulled the trigger on one of these. Let me know what the authentication result is.

I haven't sent mine in because of COVID-19 delays but will do so once things calm down.

Let me know what the result is buddy

The slight ink fading is a very good sign of the autograph's authenticity. Should be Good :)

Thank you Buddy :) 

I will let you know when I send it for authentication and what the result is. 

Awesome :)

 

This at least is certain. It's not done by an autopen.

It's back from Beckett :)
Dany, you were right :)

Nice Ivo! Enjoy it!

Thanks Lucas
I hope you find your MJ autograph soon

I'm sorry but i can't understand how this autograph gets an LOA. Am I the only one who has doubts?

Tell me why you dont understand ?

I look at your history and I see that you write to almost everyone not authentic not authentic and delete your opinions later.
Then justify it please!

Thanks

Thats because so many fakes out there ;)

Imo the "Michael" part is totally off. If you compare it to authentic autographs its totally different. Even in comparison to autographs from this signing event it's miles away from beeing authentic. I can't understand how this booklet passes Beckett. Maybe because this style is easier to fake i dont know..

This is just my opinion. I'm always open to debate and learn if someone has good arguments :)

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service