Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by al martin on May 11, 2014 at 9:39am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason D on May 11, 2014 at 10:05am

Al,

You are very confusing. Earlier in this thread you didn't like this Michael Jackson now you find out it is authenticated by Roger Epperson and all of a sudden you like it? When you come to making your "opinions" do you actually look at the signature or just base it off of who authenticated it? In another thread you didn't like a PSA/DNA authenticated Jon Lester jersey because the seller Misspelled Jon with John but didn't make any comparisons to the actual signature.

Also RRauction is not Rogers auction site he just happens to be the authenticator that authenticated it for RR Auction.

There is nothing wrong with this Jackson signature based on other known authentic exemplars.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carlos on May 11, 2014 at 7:05pm

I agree with the message here - I think it's ridiculous when people are so adamant an item is fake only for it to pass authentication and them instantly change their minds

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mjfan uk on May 15, 2014 at 2:33pm

Well exactly, when someone has signed thousands of items over the years, there are going to be many variations. If I was signing so many items, I would probably do different styles to keep people guessing! It wouldn't surprise me if MJ did this, not least out of boredom.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page