Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on July 24, 2013 at 3:07pm

It looks ok and the characteristics are there.. Any other opinions?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 24, 2013 at 3:37pm

maybe I am just getting too cautious but something seems off about this. it does not look to me to be fluid, it almost looks mechanical, and slowly written.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on July 24, 2013 at 5:08pm

thumbs down to my eyes, most certainly! D

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on July 24, 2013 at 9:51pm

I have attached one of my in-person McCartney signatures and on second look the 'UL' of Paul and the rest does look carefully signed, whereas Paul usually signs quite fast!

All the best!

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 32 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 25, 2013 at 4:04am

yours is a no doubter. everything is there.  I do not see the one listed here comparing favorably to the one you posted.

• ▶ Reply