We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
can you post the picture or identify the R&R auction number & lot? The good news is that if it is from R&R then they typically stand behind their sales.
Roger, imo, would be the one I would put in the 1st position for validation purposes when it comes to Elvis and the myriad of variations. There are others as well but Roger is here and has been helpful in the past and I suspect will be in the future.
Roger's point about Frank and the beatles is valid. the other extreme are the third party authenticators that claim to be able to authenticate anything and everthing. that is why you see secretarials "authenticated" as real. Because they do not take the time to study and learn each and every signature they render an opinion on. In Roger's case, because he specializes in Rock and Roll, I would trust his judgement on for example, an Elvis signature, more than I would trust one of the big guys, because he spends the required time to learn as much about the signing habits as is humanly possible. Unless you get it in person, you can never be 100% certain. So your next best bet is to get an educated opinion. Roger will provide that.
Oh grand one Greg,
Now this is a person who understands the hobby. Learn from him, very cool, smart and level headed comment.
Good pick-up Roger. Saved "by the bell" so to speak.. doesn't matter when they are caught so long as they are caught and removed. What triggered the 2ndary review if that can be shared. The consigner of the item most likely wasn't amused though. I always like looking at the specific item since I have horded many of the R&R catalogs as well as historical access then saving the picture for future non-authentic comparisons. What catalog/item# was it?
that would be a worthwhile blog while hopefully not aiding and abetting the forgers and their friends.
Don't leave Roger. You already saved me $150 in the two days I've been here :)
This isn't exactly directed at Elvis, I'm sure it still applies, but does every autograph (from one celebrity) have one thing that is always spot on the same? Like for instance let's take the three Elvis pictures you posted in your original post. Right after "El" I see three hills and then the "y" begins. Would this be something to look for? Or do you use a different method to compare signatures?
It just seems so hard to guess if something looks legit or not because a number of things could have happened while signing. The King could have been rushed and just scribbled instead of signing it nicely. Or maybe he was bumped while signing (maybe why the "y" is so messed up in the first picture?) Or maybe it's just a shaky-handed forger?
Not sure if any of that made sense but I guess my main question is what is the #1 thing you look at when you first try to figure out if something is authentic or not?
Sorry if this noob question is not cool haahaahah
Matt,
I'm not going anywhere for now. Thank you for the kind words.
Elvis is by far one of the hardest autographs to authenticate. As you can see the many variations he made even during the same period makes it so very hard. Bob Dylan is probably the hardest, I have studied him though the most. He's my favorite, ok add Tom Waits. The very first thing to look for in an Elvis autograph is that the "E" in "Elvis" is NEVER taller then the "L" following it. There may be one oddball one somewhere that someone with way too much time on their hands may be able to dig up and agrue about but that is the #1 rule of thumb. You will see that in all of the examples I posted. Hope that helps.
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service