We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Rolling Stones Signatures - good ??

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Josef Wurzer on October 17, 2016 at 10:53am

That's mine - Nov. 63

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on October 16, 2016 at 2:49pm

I assumed lookin at these that it was real.if it isn't real ,it's a really good forgery.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 16, 2016 at 3:23pm

when I see items like this that are deemed to be forgeries, and the forger is that good, I wonder why there aren't more of them.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on October 16, 2016 at 5:31pm

They do all look signed by same pen and pressure. Once at a Phila Wizard World con I was talking to this young Asian gentleman ,an artist in artist row . As he was doodling I asked him if he could draw Stan Lees sig. He immediately did and I'm sure it would have fooled most people. Theres kitchen table forgers and guys out there that can sign peoples names better than they can. Forging has been an art for 100s of years.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on October 16, 2016 at 7:00pm

That is something else. Wish the law cracked down on it. It's a theft and insult to collectors who spend their hard earned money on an autograph they think they are getting!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on October 16, 2016 at 7:07pm

Not real. After further investigating on the signatures I noticed Brian Jones signature was not right. The upper half part of the B is way off. And Keith Richard looks funny now too. After this, I amend my earlier decision.