Sex Pistols... once again

Hi!

Here´s antother Sex Pistols signed object, i would be thankful to get some help with.

It looks quite good to me... But theres something with Pauls sign, am i wrong?

Again i'll be glad for all opinions i can get....

Best regards Martin (still novice...)

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by J.Seah on September 12, 2012 at 10:02am

The Paul Cook is a little off especially the "k". Glen Matlock signature is also not quite right in my opinion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J.Seah on September 13, 2012 at 9:26am

Hi Martin!!

Someone who is familiar with Sex Pistols autographs have the following opinion on your Sex Pistols item.

"I think it's 100% good... the paul cook is typical of a set that's well over 12 years old.same with johnny rotten... the glen matlock looks like a rushed signature as well. i think it's totally good.."

Good luck!!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Martin on September 13, 2012 at 11:20am

Thanks a lot J. Seah for your answers!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gary Harvey on September 13, 2012 at 1:31pm

not authentic

repeat NOT

matlock never signs first name only !

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Martin on September 13, 2012 at 3:47pm

You have à point there. Cant find any other picture of a glen autograph with only first name...

J. Seah, have your friend, who is familar with pistols autographs, some idea about that?

Thanx!!