We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

This McCartney ball...ouch!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/THE-BEATLES-PAUL-McCARTNEY-SIGNED-OAL-BASEB...

Views: 3844

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by N.Daniel on February 12, 2014 at 6:02pm

Oh but that signature is veryyyy fluid it must be real!! 

Permalink Reply by Rich on February 12, 2014 at 6:25pm

I'll always remember the infamous Meg Ryan baseball smear.

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on February 12, 2014 at 7:25pm

i still cant figure out if lady Gaga is a man or woman. Has it ever been confirmed??

Permalink Reply by Jason D on February 12, 2014 at 7:37pm

I guess we can ask this guy but he may feel a little violated at this point.

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on February 12, 2014 at 8:54pm
Yeah PSA authenticating this just confirms my opinion they are almost worthless with music and entertainment items. Pure cash grab on this one.
Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 13, 2014 at 9:55pm
I think this is authentic. In - person and probably strange due to the round surface and in-person opportunity!
Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 13, 2014 at 9:57pm
My last comment was directed at the first, top image of the signed Macca baseball!
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 14, 2014 at 3:54am

I would agree with you on that.  the blue sharpie ball I can buy into.  the one that is the subject of this discussion looks like a 2 year old signed it.  I dont see ANY positive characteristics or anything that would give any one an inkling that it could be authentic.  Unless he signed it with the pen in his mouth.  but I would need video evidence of that.

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on February 14, 2014 at 9:46am

If anyone has ever tried to sign a baseball they will find it is very difficult to do when sitting down and trying but it would be even more difficult if in a walking situation.  I don't authenticate balls that are signed by people that normally don't sign them as you get yourself into situations like this when in fact it might be real.  It was shown to me and like always I said I don't do baseballs but Jimmy or someone there might have known more about the submitter and chose to pass it.  You can't judge it like a signed album or photo that is flat.

Permalink Reply by Rich on February 14, 2014 at 11:08am

To add to what William said, I have this wild fascination with knowing what the source of the autograph is.  Who got it, when, where, etc.  Even when the signature is spot on and can be authenticated on its own merit, I prefer to know the story behind what I'm buying.  When PSA or JSA authenticate based purely on the source (something that even I can do), I'd still like to know what the deal is.  But that's information PSA and JSA pretty much erases as far as I can tell.  On the other hand, it's probably not a bad idea on their end, since some of those "trustworthy" sources are crap.

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 14, 2014 at 11:46am

I don't expect a signed ball to took like a flat, especially if its someone that does not sign baseballs very often (like Paul).  but I do expect there to be SOME semblance of letter formation, or something that ties it to the writer.  the sharpie signed ball does this, and there is one on ebay currently that I believe also has positive characteristics.

I go back to my original statement, this baseball contains one of those signatures that has no business being authenticated.

Permalink Reply by Randy on February 14, 2014 at 1:01pm

Well, we now have a picture of one of the two in question being signed so unless you want to argue against a picture, we now know that one is INDEED authentic and the provenance used to deem it authentic is about as good as you can get. 

Imagine that!

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service