Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 11:43am

That is why I collected it. It is experimental and yet has so many observable typical traits. 

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 11:46am

Back to this one, yours in one of the first sigs of 76' and mine is one of the last of 75'. Anything catch your eye?

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 11:55am

I always remember that image because of the mic boom. I may be wrong, but isn't that TMWFTE still a reissue from the 1980's?  

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 12:08pm

Original

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 12:33pm

That reminded me of this problem - JSA and all:

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 12:42pm

The forgery is poor but it got stickered despite being dated a few years before the photograph was even printed.

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 12:45pm

That's great. The Reverses of stills is often of more value than the Obverse. Those stills are pretty indistinguishable from the later reissues then. 

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 12:48pm

The Roman numerals on the bottom of the photo say 1981 and it was signed in 79'.....what's the problem?

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 12:51pm

RE the 76 and 75 signing angle I suppose. Both are constructed in very different ways.

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 2:07pm

Why were the still postdated to 81? The 79 date is in line with the second release date.

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• Next ›
• Page