We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
[Editor's Note: Dave Wakefield photos were added Feb. 23, 2011]
February 22, 2011—In 2009 and 2010, the Internet Autograph Dealer Alliance (IADA-CC) published several articles about rock autograph expert Roger Epperson. These articles accused Epperson of everything from selling fake autographs, to authenticating forgeries as genuine, to credit card fraud, to being the subject of an FBI investigation and more. But the IADA-CC issued a public apology to Epperson today, admitting that none of their accusations were true.
The apology, published on the IADA-CC's Web site, called their articles about Epperson "malicious," "false" and "unjustified," and was signed by president Michael Frost and former officer Richard Scott.
Epperson owns two autograph companies: Signed, Sealed, Delivered, which sells modern music autographs; and Roger Epperson Authentication Limited (REAL), a third-party authenticator of modern music autographs.
Frost is the owner of Professional Autograph Authentication Service (PAAS).
The IADA-CC said the information in the articles came primarily through emails from sources they trusted at the time, and that some of the emails contained links to Web sites that published similar false information about Epperson. The apology further stated that they found "...most of the e-mails to be coming from enemies of the autograph hobby and from fraudulent e-mail addresses with an anti 3rd party authentication agenda."
No names of persons or Web sites involved in the articles that the IADA-CC called false were mentioned in the apology except for Dave Wakefield (aka Dave Smith). Wakefield is the owner of Florida autograph gallery Rock and Roll Heaven Memorabilia Inc. (www.rocknrollheaven.biz), and was recently pictured with his face blocked out in a Feb. 14, 2011 article on Autograph Alert accusing James Spence Authentication of being biased against autographs authenticated by Christopher Morales.
Dave Wakefield with face blocked out in Feb. 14, 2011 article on JSA on Autograph Alert Web site.
Dave Wakefield in photo from his Web site, www.rocknrollheaven.biz.
Articles similar to the ones that the IADA-CC apologized for were posted on autographalert.com and behindthegavel.com in 2009-2010, and were still on those sites when we checked today. While both sites operate anonymously, the parties involved are known. Behind the Gavel was founded by Jerry Gladstone of American Royal Arts in 2009. Gladstone is the subject of an FBI investigation into the trafficking in rock 'n' roll forgeries. American Royal Arts filed an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors in July 2010; a Florida version of bankruptcy. ARA continues to operate under Court supervision.
The IADA-CC's apology was originally posted on their Web site Feb. 22, 2011. They replaced that version with the one they slightly edited, below:
"A letter of apology to Roger Epperson
Date: 2011-02-22 11:27:11Notice to all members and visitors to the IADA-CC,
In recent months you may have seen information and news articles posted on the IADA-CC website attacking the integrity of a long time autograph collector, dealer and authenticator, Roger Epperson. These articles were malicious in nature and were way outside the scope of anything the IADA/CC stands for.
It is for this reason Michael Frost and Richard Scott of the IADA-CC are taking this opportunity to publicly apologize to Roger Epperson and his company REAL.
The IADA-CC had been receiving many e-mails daily from collectors and others believed to be trusted sources. The e-mails were sent to the IADA-CC under many different names and seemed credible at the time to our news director.
We were also sent several links with information taken from other websites that may not have been true. These e-mails were coming to the club and to the club directors daily. After a fact-finding mission, neither the IADA-CC nor its officers including Michael Frost and Richard Scott have any knowledge of any fraudulent or unethical activities by Roger Epperson. We find the following information that has been posted or emailed to be absolutely FALSE and unjustified. We also have found most of the e-mails to be coming from enemies of the autograph hobby and from fraudulent e-mail addresses with an anti 3rd party authentication agenda.
a. Roger Epperson authenticated signatures on album covers that were knowingly forged or not signed until after the death of signatories, and charged Dave Smith a/k/a Dave Wakefield [Editor's Note: It is actually Dave Wakefield aka Dave Smith, as Smith is Wakefield's alias.] for the authentication and then offered to purchase the albums. This statement is false and we found the published allegations to be untrue and the result of false information provided by others to the IADA-CC with intent to damage the character and authentication work of Roger Epperson.
b. Roger Epperson issued Letters of Authenticity and in many cases never examined the autographs. This statement is false and we found the published allegations to be untrue and the result of false information provided by others to IADA-CC with intent to damage the character and authentication work of Roger Epperson, .
c. An article in IADA-CC news “The Roger Epperson Scandal and investigation, is handed over to the authorities,” statement that there was a Roger Epperson Scandal that was being investigated by authorities, including the FBI, that IADA-CC had received reports of errors in authentication and selling of non-authentic material by ROGER EPPERSON, that a watchdog committee set up to monitor the action of Signed, Sealed & Delivered and “REAL,” two of the Epperson Companies had reported dozens of questionable items removed from ROGER EPPERSON’s website, that IADA-CC was receiving reports from major auction companies, eBay and dealers removing Epperson authenticated items from their sites, that ROGER EPPERSON had been officially removed from being a member of IADA-CC. This statement is false and we found the published allegations to be untrue and the result of false information provided by others to IADA-CC with intent to damage the character and authentication work of Roger Epperson and the IADA-CC apologizes.
To show good faith and unity the IADA-CC would like to offer Roger Epperson a full life time membership in the IADA-CC.
The IADA-CC reorganized with only one goal in mind and only wishes to accomplish this goal. We are here to help promote the autograph world as a wonderful and valuable hobby, create lines of communication among its members, and help to educate our public in making good choices in finding rare and collectible signatures.
We all make mistakes, and for this mistake we sincerely apologize to Roger Epperson. We wish him all the best and hope we can, in some way, work together in the future.
We think Roger Epperson is a valued and important part of the autograph community. It is very important that we are able to work together or at least communicate. Michael Frost, Roger Epperson and the IADA-CC have a common bond and that is to educate and to help the autograph community. We should have been spending our time and effort fighting the bad guys in the industry and not each other.
The infighting among the most important and respected members of the autograph community must stop. The time has come to focus on bringing back a safe environment for autograph collectors.
We sincerely hope that Roger Epperson and the autograph community accept our apology.
Sincerely,
Michael Frost, Richard Scott and The IADA-CC.
Additional information on this story will be provided as it becomes available.
Rick,
The black eye is already there. If we don't take the forgers head-on they'll keep on stealing from collectors left and right. It's what keeps this field from being much larger than it currently is.
no steve, I think it's just the opposite - the field is wide and large and unfortunately due to all the junk and garbage out there - "civil wars" break out between neighbors and friends when someone more astute identifies a fake or those "engagements" between dealers (reputable and not) that result in "blog wars" and then we have these out of nowhere retractions.
Incidently, "Where the defendant in an action for libel, at any time after the publication of the libel hereinafter referred to, either before or after such action is brought, but before the answer is required to be filed therein, gives written notice to the plaintiff or to his attorney of his intention to publish a retraction of the libel, accompanied by a copy of the retraction which he intends to publish, and the retraction is published, he may prove such publication, and, if the plaintiff does not accept the offer of retraction, the defendant may prove such nonacceptance in mitigation of damages. If within a reasonable time after receiving notice in writing from the plaintiff that he claims to be libelled the defendant makes such offer and publishes a reasonable retraction, and such offer is not accepted, he may prove that the alleged libel was published in good faith and without actual malice, and, unless the proof is successfully rebutted, the plaintiff shall recover only for any actual damage sustained. In no action of slander or libel shall exemplary or punitive damages be allowed, whether because of actual malice or want of good faith or for any other reason. Proof of actual malice shall not enhance the damages recoverable for injury to the plaintiff’s reputation."
Perhaps this is not the case but unlike you and Rez I am not too forgiving until actions and deeds outweigh the past transgressions.
So they are eating their words now huh? I wonder when the other two problem children will see the writing on the wall and make similar statements?
Way to stay in the fight Roger! Maybe this will blow the lid off of the "other side" and they will keep telling on themselves.
What happened there?
In many years observing the autograph fake-market never read such a letter of apologize. Is this letter a fake as well?
Or is there any agreement between these parties?
Would be interesting to read some more and true informations.
Bravo Roger, Bravo!
It's odd, regardless of what drove this, that the one most offended is often times the most gracious.
why is it that some just don't learn the lesson. Isn't Frost involved with this and didn't he start complaining about posts on Fudd's mantle... and we wonder why respect is lost so quickly. Seems the libel machine is back in progress; Looks to me like the NEW-IADA is alot like the old one.
I'm just glad there are no known snapshots of him when Brandon authenticates Bob Kane, Batman & Robin as wearing Batman Wings & Leotards while swooping down would be too much too "bare", lol!
Brandon Mysinger the problem with the autograph Industry. | ||||||||||
Date: 2011-12-17 04:42:39 | ||||||||||
Please known who you are dealing with when it comes to Authentication
|
Comment
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
You need to be a member of Autograph Live to add comments!
Join Autograph Live