Comment by russell Brand on January 1, 2013 at 10:55pm

I have a number of Ginger Rodgers autographs including two that were obtained in person.  The others were from dealers who I have found to be reliable.  The signature you have posted differs from every example I have seen.  I would regard it as suspicious.

Comment by Robert Sledz on January 1, 2013 at 11:42pm

Ok ...thank you for your thoughts.

Comment by Robert Sledz on January 1, 2013 at 11:47pm

Fyi.... If you have had them signed in person, what if her signature evolved a bit from the 40's to the 80's?

Comment by Craig Bowley on January 2, 2013 at 9:14am

Unless it was inscribed or had a strong provenance I would probably pass on this one. Check google images "ginger rogers autograph." Some of these are secretarial. Early movie star autographs are usually more valuable but also more difficult to authenticate.

Comment by Robert Sledz on January 2, 2013 at 1:12pm

I guess your smarter than me.

Comment by Craig Bowley on January 2, 2013 at 7:15pm

More like too cautious.

Comment by www.TheCEAD.com on January 6, 2013 at 2:40am

Check out my entry on my authentication guide, Ginger Rogers at www.TheCEAD.com. I think you'll find it extremely useful and it will quickly answer your question.

Gary

***

Founder, www.TheCEAD.com

Owner, www.ClassicEntertainmentAutographs.com

Comment