Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James yesterday

The checks have all been encapsulated and authenticated by PSA, so I imagine it was not required to pay Epperson to also examine them. In regard to the Tracks COA, it will have previously been sold by Tracks, and the COA has been retained with the item. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Evelyne L. yesterday

Interesting! I was wondering why someone would have their autographs authenticated by both Tracks and RR Auction.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman yesterday

The checks are fine...I've seen these before. The signed checks probably originated from Tracks. They issue their COA with the items...the winner gets a COA from Tracks and one from R&R Auctions. You see this happen quite a bit...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Evelyne L. yesterday

Thinking about it I've seen some with both Tracks AND Roger Epperson and others without Epperson. I wonder in what situations they consider his approval relevant or not.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Raul Serrano yesterday

Well, this is because the check signed by John and Paul came from Tracks and was subsequently encapsulated. It's a very nice set, to be honest.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Evelyne L. 21 hours ago

Nice set indeed! I wish I could purchase a full set but I guess I'll slowly build my collection :) 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JDZelenka 17 hours ago

It's fairly normal if an item originated with Tracks or has an earler Tracks letter as it adds value to the piece. They do the same with letters from Frank Caiazzo. For RR items without certification you can usually pay extra to have Roger Epperson of Real certify it. Sometimes other certifiers may be associated with a piece. 

• ▶ Reply