Beatles Signed Envelope 1964

Hello all,

I hope these two pics show up!

I would be interested in some opinions of these signatures - Signed on an envelope mid to late 1964.

Cheers, Len

Views: 1041

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Don Webster on December 1, 2016 at 5:30pm

As they'd say in Liverpool...."lovely....quite lovely..."

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 1, 2016 at 5:55pm

someone will probably prove me wrong, but I am not a big fan of these signatures.

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 1, 2016 at 6:09pm

Well, I agree with you FWIW.

Permalink Reply by fab432 on December 1, 2016 at 7:48pm
Hmmmmm what makes you say that?
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 1, 2016 at 7:56pm

I'm not a Beatles guy, they just looked equally light and a bit hesitant/scratchy in the John (h), George seems a bit odd like an unnameable flavor slightly off in a soup, Paul's "P" and "L"... And with some odd shapes/volumes/neg spaces. I am looking to learn here. :)

Permalink Reply by fab432 on December 1, 2016 at 8:03pm
Yeah I can see what you mean. I'm not sold on these signatures either. My initial take was John's looked a bit like Neil's work.
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 1, 2016 at 8:06pm

Maybe a lack of conviction in the sigs shows as well. I just answered - did not look at Aspinall etc. re John. Are these placements reasonable?

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 1, 2016 at 8:35pm
There does appear to be some noticeable problems with these signatures.
Permalink Reply by fab432 on December 2, 2016 at 3:53am
When I first saw them I thought they looked pretty good but when I started to really look at them I had second thoughts. George's signature looks too controlled compared to the others. The P and a in Paul look off as does the R in Ringo. The spacing in John also looks off to me.
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 3, 2016 at 2:35pm

They initially looked good to me too. I then noticed some some potential issues as I mentioned, but I see that a few were likely caused by folds in the paper. The majority of it looks quite good. I think Don is is probably correct and that it's likely authentic.

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on December 2, 2016 at 10:45am

There are a few problems with this set....

Permalink Reply by fab432 on December 2, 2016 at 10:59am
Yes it certainly looks that way. Thanks for checking them out.

RSS

As an eBay Partner Network Affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Get Our Newsletter

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2026   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service