Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John Spillane on December 30, 2018 at 1:38pm

Put their names in the heading and you're more than likely to get comments. If you just put in real or fake, you're going to be ignored.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by fab432 on December 30, 2018 at 1:57pm

Ok the first and third photos have “autopen” signatures which are nice but not hand signed. The third photo is a nice photo from the “Revolution” era and these are rarer than the early auto penned photos. The 2nd photo has pre printed signatures.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on December 30, 2018 at 1:59pm

Second is pretty questionable. Others are pre-prints. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 30, 2018 at 2:38pm

I believe the second one was signed on their behalf by Neil Aspinall.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on December 30, 2018 at 4:04pm

The 1st and last pics are first name autopens....the pic from 1969 looks to be by Neil Aspinall...none are genuine...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 30, 2018 at 4:18pm

Yes, first and third are autopens. Neil Aspinall Beatles signatures are considered collectible and do have value.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lubos on December 31, 2018 at 2:18am

Oh. That's a pity. Thank you very much for your help, everyone. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lubos on December 31, 2018 at 5:30am

Oh. That's a pity. Thank you very much for your help, everyone. 

• ▶ Reply