Would this Mick Jagger pass PSA, JSA, or Beckett? Al Wittnebert LOA

I posted my Mick Jagger signed Rolling Stone magazine from February 14, 1985...a couple of years ago. I only got a couple of responses, both saying it was authentic. One of those members was Richard Booth whom I greatly respect.

It was originally authenticated by Al Wittnebert who is currently the President of the UACC, I believe. He’s been in the hobby for years, and I believe he has a very good reputation.

But what do you think? Do you think it’s authentic, and would it pass one of the big three TPAs?

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on July 29, 2019 at 4:13am

There is a difference between an autograph being genuine and actually passing a TPA authentication. No guarantees that will happen. Richard knows his Mick. IMO, this is another ugly Jagger that is likely genuine.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on July 29, 2019 at 4:51am

Here's my Jagger for comparison.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on July 29, 2019 at 1:55pm

Thanks, Joe.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on July 29, 2019 at 1:58pm

I hope I didn't offend you saying it was ugly. So is mine! Just the way Mick usually signs them.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on July 29, 2019 at 6:15pm

Not at all, Joe. I agree...most of Mick’s autographs aren’t that eye-appealing. There are a few that look nice where you can actually make out every letter of his last name, but that’s not the majority for sure.