Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on August 9, 2019 at 5:59am

Ever seen something that was almost too perfect? Structurally this autograph appears fine which it may well be. But for an autograph which may have been signed over 50 years ago it looks too fresh. I bet I looked at hundreds of Sinatra autographs over the years and most look their age. This one doesn't.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark on August 9, 2019 at 6:55am

I see what you mean and thought the same.

There are no hesitations however .it could have been carefully stored 

I have had, in the past 1920s autographs that looked as new! 

But yes i take onboard your point

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark on August 9, 2019 at 6:56am

Its definately  late fifties though as its not typical of the 40s style  and the 70s and eighties were different again

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on August 9, 2019 at 7:47am

This has "that look" - undedicated unaged clean little signature but I don't like the construction. It does not appear naturally signed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on August 9, 2019 at 12:13pm

in my opinion, does not have the character or personality of an authentic Sinatra signature.  As mentioned before, its too perfect and clean.

• ▶ Reply