We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Hello everybody,

Just get this autograph signed on april 19th 1997 in Musée Grévin in Paris.

So in love with it !

Views: 2356

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I agree. This is from my personal collection. 1953 PC and a candid contact sheet from Gleason's own collection, also 1953. I have helped several folks here buy and obtain Gleason sigs and finish cast collections. It is very exciting  - the hunt for raw uncerted genuine items at good prices. I do not buy or sell anything with a sticker etc.

That is fantastic 

Thank you :)

Here is another:

Very cool, and a true pleasure to view. Thanks for sharing these!

Thanks :) I am glad you enjoyed them. I love the one with the CBS camera. I have about 20 images total.

You are quite fortunate to have made these acquisitions. The rarity is off the charts. Just great stuff.

Thank you! :)

this is an authentic MJ drawing with his signature and a star burst at the end.

I'm not an expert on Michael Jackson, but the few people on this site that are, don't like it. I will say this, though. The BIG MISTAKE people make with autographs, many times, is the ITEM the signature is on. I once saw an Elvis signature on a matchbook cover. That is a very, very small surface for a signature, and it looked good to me. Well, RR Auctions had to pull it, because someone said it was fake (and I think it probably was). You could say "Why would somebody do that, on a small matchbook cover of a casino." Well, for that very reason. Sure, they could find a used Elvis album, or something else, but...sometimes having a plain piece of paper, or a matchbook cover, or a bar napkin, makes people think -- It must be real, because why would someone that could forge, do it on such a crappy item like a napkin? Well, because it makes you think it must be real. (or a dollar bill, etc)

I consider myself good when it comes to MJ, because his signature is the only one I care about. There is simply nothing about this signature that would suggest it being real. I'm a firm believer that even rushed signatures, often times, have good features, but here I seriously see none. I believe Roger has made a mistake this time.

Also another thing that doesn't make sense to me: the autograph it self is very very rushed, you can't read one letter in either the first and last name. Yet there is "love" AND the star at end of the N in Jackson, which makes no sense 

Totally agree with you @gmesiano! 0% chance that this is authentic. 

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service