We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Paul Mccartney Ringo Starr signed autograph page left by family member opinions please

Views: 394

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They appear to have avoided ageing. Macca is a bit shaky. That ink is bright/fresh looking.

thanks eric, the book was always kept in a sealed bag in a draw, i dont really know much about how ink deteriorates, thanks for your opinion

Agreed. Ringo's is not familiar to me, but McCartney's looks to me "not-sure". It seems odd to me and the actually fresh ink makes me feel uncomfortable. It "brights" like a recent writing, instead a 60 years aged. Just my opinion.

thanks forgers, could being kept sealed keep the ink that bright?

Maybe but I insist, the Paul's one looks to me odd, I see some unsecure details, as if it was made by someone who doesn't have the original flow of a genuine handwriting. There's quite a lack of precision in it IMHO.

thank you forgers, i really appreciate your opininon

The signatures show no sign of oxidation after 58 years, the paper unusually fresh as well and that is often cheaper paper. I've no doubt the paper is vintage.

They don’t look authentic to me, unfortunately.

Both signatures appear to have the same pressure and ink dispersal. I am not liking this at all. Ballroom will know.

I hate to beat a dead horse but this has zero flow.  Look at all the shakiness 

No thanks...next....

Signed yesterday in an old autograph book.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service