Hello, I have my eye on this and wonder if I could get some opinions?

Thanks in advance!

Views: 1549

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


They’re not the same signatures. 

Sorry, I edited my response. I typed that before I had the sigs side by side

"...Thank you Steve, I appreciate you looking into this for me. To me, this looks like it could be the same photo and sigs, just a different contrast..." - Robby93

The same as in the same? Obviously not?

Actually, I agree. This is a forgery. 

We’ll if that’s the case I’m glad someone outbid me on it…..

I have posted this pic on various other groups and one of the original owners chimed in that he had sold it last. He claims it had an Epperson letter with it. But too much controversy for me........

That's important. Please send me a link to the group where one of the original owners said it had an Epperson LOA.

BTW, what do you mean by "one of the original owners"? It had more than one original owner? Did they say they got it signed themselves?

From "had" i took it to mean it no longer does, became separated etc. But if it still does that would be interesting. Robby almost bid on it - was it not included?

Re: owners.......I did not have a detailed message with the individual. I assumed there was more than one owner, as he stated it had an LOA from Epperson. If I had gotten it myself I wouldn't have gotten an LOA

I wonder why the signatures and papers parted.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service