We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

7 Claptons which is real?

Hi all, I have obtained 7 Eric Clapton autographs through the years and obviously some are not real. I feel good about 1 of these because of the dealer, the rest highly questionable. I obviously need some help, so thanks for looking and value your input. Mark

Tags: autograph, clapton, eric

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on January 14, 2012 at 3:03pm

none of these are authentic in my opinion, the only one that has any hope is #1

#2 I know the forger #3 is secretarial

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 15, 2012 at 10:08am

All 7 in your 3 posts are placed as images now, Mark. (You can upload images to display by using the second button from the left.) Makes for a really good comparison. Sorry you got stung on most of these.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Greig on January 16, 2012 at 7:49pm

Here's two that are similar to #3 authenticated by PSA/DNA both on ebay.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 16, 2012 at 10:10pm

I like the Clapton dated 92. I don't like the one above it. Your thoughts?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on January 16, 2012 at 11:58pm

I think the ´92 Clapton is genuine.

The signed record seems to be secreterial.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Greig on January 18, 2012 at 11:29am

They both look the same to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by roger epperson on January 18, 2012 at 1:09pm

Look at the shape of the "E" and the bumps in "ric" that is the tell tale sign plus the forward slant and the tucked close date on the secretarial compared to the authentic one.