We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Please give me your opinions on these  5 Paul McCartney autographs:

Tags: autographs, paul Mccartney, signed photos

Views: 11457

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Its cause the autograph is fake and he is probably the producer of it . He thought he would try to spit the same song and dance the rest of them do .

Everyone has in on the music industry and somehow gets the muscian to sit and sign a huge amount of items for them .

 

 

I'm not sure it's bad...it's beyond my pay grade.

It doesnt have the charteristics of a real one from 91 .

Yeah Carl, because I had just heard about this site and was looking into feedback on some items that I recently acquired, genius.  SMH

Nice one Anthony

Perhaps he is using a False name and as I asked before perhaps he is looking to generate a argument ?

Mike may not be using his real name. If he has that McCartney he probably has other interesting autographs to share. Let's give him a chance.

Thanks Steve. I go by Michael (it would never show up anywhere as Mike) and my username is my first name followed by a fragment of something else (ie. not my last name). I would have gladly given my last name, but based on the ridiculous comments made by some on here, I am now choosing not to. Steve, I believe this is your site, and if so, you probably have access to my last name. Feel free to look me up on your own, to validate my credentials, but I respectfully ask you not to share it with others.

Thanks.

Really Anthony? Care to put your $$ where your big and ignorant mouth is?  My name and affiliation in the music industry (including my time at Capitol) is listed more times on the internet than you have brain cells! Paul did an interview with Rick Dees. I won't go into the reasons why he did the interview, but I assure you that the station briefly played his new record at the time to support his appearance. Attached is a group shot that Paul took with the station staff that day, which I am posting for no other reason that to make you eat a whole lot of crow- OPEN WIDE!

Ok no problem. Im wrong your right.

What was the reason for posting that question if you know the autograph is authentic.

Are you selling it . Did you just want to make people look stupid.

Its makes no sense. You gotta understand that this site is attacked by people who want it shut down. You seemed to be going on the same cynical path they do .

Your autograph does not look authentic. Plain and simple.  IMHO . I sitll dont buy your story . But thats just me . Good luck with what ever your trying to prove here.

Here is a Paul Mccartney signed Nov 27 1989 Inglewood , Ca . He didnt change his autograph to much in 1991.

It was still sloppy and not as neat as the one you are trying to pass as real. This was signed in front of and given to the person who was in charge of booking music events for the Great Western Forum .

It is authenticated by psa. I own it .

Compare it to yours.

Now let me show you something else I bought .

It was suppose to be signed by Mccartney in 1991 as well . I took it to psa , they said nope . Common forgery . Showed me over 40 examples of the same autograph . They knew where they were coming from and gave me more that enough proof to educate me enought to show my autograph was a fake. I sent it back to person for refund . I bought 5 from the same person . The autoraph fooled me cause I was undeducated at the time .

 

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service