We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

This set looks good to me, but I'd be interested to hear your views on them.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

Thanks

Lewis

Views: 2305

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Looks good...

Thanks again guys.

A slightly bigger picture. Though it looks like just a scaled up version of the other!

Attachments: No photo uploads here

It looks authentic to me.

Looks OK.

thanks for the help

That 2nd set..look at it again...I don't think they are real.....a good try but still no good in my opinion.

Really? Why do you think this?

I think they are done by a clever forger however glaring mistakes in all 4 signatures, take a closer look and you'll see, I've seen this set before and it was rejected then too.

to be honest, I just looked at the larger photo,and it is revealing some things that are questionable.  

You are right Beatleworld. The s in Starr is different. The Paul is supposed to look rushed but it lacks his style. It pays to ask the experts. It is a pretty good forgery.

I would be amazed if it isn't authentic. Even the dedication by Ringo looks good.

You could be right on the Ringo. The writing is good. I found another Ringo signed the same in March 1963. The  Paul is still odd.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service