Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ParisBlues on March 13, 2013 at 1:26pm

Anyone?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on March 13, 2013 at 1:34pm

This might be one for an expert.

There is something about it I don´t like

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ParisBlues on March 13, 2013 at 1:55pm

Thank you A.B. Could you explain what you don't like specifically?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by A.B. on March 13, 2013 at 2:19pm

Not really :-)

It was more a weird gut feeling about this autograph.

After a little further consideration it might really be genuine. I don´t have a 1991 exemplar in my files, but it is very close to this 1989 autograph which should be genuine.

You might want to ask Roger epperson about this one.

 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ParisBlues on March 13, 2013 at 3:14pm

Thank you very much for posting this 1989 signature. It looks globally similar but much more rounded than the one I've posted.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ParisBlues on March 13, 2013 at 4:18pm

Anyone else?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brian M. Wazac on March 13, 2013 at 4:41pm

I dont believe it to be real. The "ic" is the 1st give away but I'm w/ A B gut feeling...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ParisBlues on March 13, 2013 at 4:52pm

I've posted a close up of the signature, I hope it will help...

• ▶ Reply