Views: 414

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I really do not like the Williams. It is all stretched out and the last part of Williams seems malformed and drawn.

Not sure about the DiMaggio.

What about this Zipper? http://i39.tinypic.com/2lc2ntg.jpg

Right. I don't ever recall seeing the "iams" so neatly drawn and as large as the "ll" on an authentic example.

Maybe it is good... can't say with certainty. But it's one I'd avoid because I would never be sure either way. I like to avoid items where the "story" sells the autograph more than the signatures themselves.

Was apparently signed at a public signing during the 91 all star game in Toronto. Maybe they were both in a rush?

I don't like either of them at all.

What do you think about the program?

The JOE D on the program is AUTHENTIC IMO. I can't see enough of the Williams to opine.

Here's a picture, tell me what you think :)

From what I can see I'd say "Likely Authentic". 

Personally I would pass because this is signed "To Al" and the Joe D sig is super, super rushed.

Prettyyyyyy good price. The ball and program come from the same person, from the same event and apparently were given to him by the Prime Minister of Canada and his son.

In response to some of you mentioning the difference in size of many of the letters, here's an Upper Deck ball that looks quite similar:

http://thumbs2.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/msMFarJQAcVGicuz3Fke_Jg.jpg

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service