Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Erich Jerozal on November 10, 2013 at 9:29am

Idk.  It looks very dark and the sig is very thick..  I do not know if this could pass authentication.  There is no definition to the sig.  Everything is mushed.  But it comes from a seller that I have done Quick Opinions on and came back Likely Genuine.   Just very hard to say on this one. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Fuddjcal on November 10, 2013 at 9:40am

very easy to say PASS. The only reason to buy a bat with Koufax on it is to smash it over your own head for being a moron... especially trash like this one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Erich Jerozal on November 10, 2013 at 9:46am

Why is it moronic fudd????

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Erich Jerozal on November 10, 2013 at 9:51am

My guess is your saying that Koufax does not sign bats??  Also not interested in buying just had authenticity questions on it. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on November 10, 2013 at 10:03am

As someone noted, the signature has no detail and is a sub par example at best. It is an example I would avoid simply because it could always be questioned, even if it is authentic.

I never really understood getting pitchers' signatures on bats, but maybe that is just me. :-)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on November 10, 2013 at 10:31am

I do not believe the slowly signed ,no slant signature is authentic anyway. I don't know that Koufax doesn't sign bats, he just doesn't sign a lot of anything.

• ▶ Reply