We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

I think these could be authentic what's your thoughts guys

Views: 441

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

they are authentic. early 1963.

These look good to me too.

They look authentic, but the photos are too small to tell if they're genuine or copies of genuine ones.

Rob, keep in mind that while you can tell if most autographs are clearly fake from even fairly small photos alone, you generally need to see an autograph in person to make sure it's the real deal.

Thanks for the opinions and thanks for advice steve,
When you say copies? Like reproductions? Would you tell the difference instantly from originals in person?
Cheers,
Rob

Yes, Rob, copies of genuine autographs printed on a vintage piece of paper or objects like records, balls or gloves. A clear, large high resolution photos is usually pretty reliable, but nothing is more reliable than seeing the piece in person. But I didn't mean that you could tell the difference instantly in person. Maybe so, or you might have to study it to make sure it's not copied and that the medium it's on makes sense.

Is that the same item ballroom?

It's a pic from when they were sold at auction by Christie's.

Did you crop those, Ballroom?

No, it's the full pic.

Christie's must have cropped the photos then. I didn't know they did that to cuts. 

Authentic

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service