We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Community Conduct Rules: What should they be?

We need rules of conduct for Autograph Magazine Live. We're going to put them in place today.

What do you think they should be?

1 member likes this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Sam Iam on January 31, 2015 at 12:01pm

Simply asking a question don't get so touchy Steve.
A lot of the opinions on that thread were formed straight from the deposition so if you have a problem with it please take it up with those who stated those things.

And calm down sheesh

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dane on January 31, 2015 at 2:12pm

Why are depositions in an active case being posted on a public forum? Wouldn't that lead to that information possibly being inadmissible?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike T on January 31, 2015 at 12:11pm

I was not asked for specifics, I was asked for dates which I gave. If you would like specifics on fake autographs sold through RR over the years I would be happy to make a thread, but I have no desire for it to be taken as an attack against them.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard on January 31, 2015 at 2:04pm

Please do .....I want to see all the fraud at R & R as I have spent 10k of dollars with them....

quite frankly this is starting to look like a huge conspiracy amongst high end dealers

where is the thread on the R and R lawsuit ..has it been removed ?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 31, 2015 at 11:57am

Sam,

No one connected with RR has pressured me into doing anything. A member of AML mentioned the RR discussion to me yesterday morning, and when I saw what was happening, I said enough was enough.

There have been a number of times when anonymous parties have thrown out all sorts of things and incited others without others here knowing where they're coming from. Are they competitors? Part of the forgery industry? People with grudges?

This is not about transparancy and holding people responsible. We will never stop that. It's actually about MAKING people responsible.

I'll talk more about the RR situation in that discussion later this weekend. But I will say this, you have to wonder about the ethics of a plaintiff and lawfirm that sets up a website and posts discovery and depositions that will taint a jury pool and cause a case to be tried outside the courtroom. I don't know of any respected lawfirm that would post depositions for public viewing before or even during trial.

How often have you seen depositions posted before trial? Go out on the internet and take a look. Edited clips of Justin Bieber's deposition on TMZ. Tom Cruise from his divorce in the Daily Mail. And members are being played by the plaintiff and eating it up.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on January 31, 2015 at 12:21pm

It's the internet age Steve. The plaintiff feels the guarantee offered failed him. He's out what $90K+? No different then giving an online review of any company. I'd bet 95% of the population has no clue who R&R auction is. Hard to believe that tainted the jury pool. The depositions and smug attitudes have tainted my opinion worse then any of the legal documents. R&R just doesn't have any facts backing up their words. The can pretend that they don't want to try this in the media etc. that's what I'd say to if I couldn't prove any if what I was saying.

I'd be willing to wage a bet they get smoked huge in court.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sam Iam on January 31, 2015 at 12:25pm

If something like this happened to anyone else, from any auction house, I would think we would all like to know.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike T on January 31, 2015 at 12:31pm

Exactly, regardless of the motive behind it, it's RR themselves that are hurting their own reputation here. It's not wild speculation, it's going off of exactly what they are telling us. Collectors spend millions of dollars there every year.. Are we supposed to just ignore something like this?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard on January 31, 2015 at 1:31pm

Steve ,

I am with Rick on this, you come across at times protective of others regardless of facts, the Epperson 10K Led Zeppelin case opened my eyes about lots of things .....making me agree to agree to your choice of authenticator goes against the very reason you have a 3 rd party authenticator , now Roger may be right but you know what , he may be wrong and that that is why you pick a 3 rd party mediator .... someone unbiased ...someone without skin in the game..I think what they are doing is brilliant cause they are looking for a class action ....

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 31, 2015 at 7:16pm

Rick,

Let's see if those $90,000 in autographs look fake to us. Would you please get links to them from the RR Auction Lawsuit site and post them in the RR discussion?

Thanks