Michael jackson real??

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on August 25, 2015 at 11:36am

It doesn't look good to me unless this is a style I'm unaware of, and that's always possible.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 25, 2015 at 12:39pm

It's from 85. After I posted this I read the description the guy had a quick op from psa and Epperson saying likely legit. Looks way different.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on August 25, 2015 at 2:46pm

Is this the one where supposedly the email from Epperson said something like, "Looks fine, " which kind of sounds like a rather short response? If that's the one, the reply sounds a little sketchy, but then again maybe it's okay.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 25, 2015 at 2:52pm

Yes that's the one.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steven Jackson on August 25, 2015 at 6:28pm

Roger always gives me short replys like " it's fine" when I get quick opinions from him

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on August 25, 2015 at 7:21pm

Same with me. Roger always give me a short response. Don't see anything wrong with it. It's just a quick opinion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 25, 2015 at 4:59pm

Can you upload a better, clear, full on image?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 25, 2015 at 5:45pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 25, 2015 at 5:47pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 25, 2015 at 5:49pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on August 25, 2015 at 5:52pm

Paul, it's a year old and you don't know what autograph he's really talking about. Same with PSA's quick opinion. Spend a few bucks and get another one.