Is this PSA Paul McCartney signed album legit?

I know there has been a lot of discussion about PSA/DNA possibly being "lenient" with some of the items submitted by its bigger clients.

So I was wondering if this Sir Paul signed album might be an example of PSA helping out a friend. It was recently passed by PSA on Dec. 21, 2015 for eBay seller autographs-for-sale out of Cave Creek, Arizona. I think they do a lot of business with PSA.

But is this an authentic Paul McCartney autograph that is being offered for $2500?

There are pics below, and here is a link:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/272090023743?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2...

Views: 1232

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul on December 31, 2015 at 11:47am
Your right Terrier the 2500 to 3500 mc signed lp's seem to sit around. Id say his signature seems to be worth a little more on the vintage era 60s for example.
But it is difficult to gauge like you say.
Just because Paul and Ringo dont sign anymore doesn't mean there is a shortage of signatures to buy.
Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 31, 2015 at 2:19pm

Caiazzo seems to add 500 bucks to the price. Of course just Paul seems to be the norm now (wouldn't want that either).

Permalink Reply by James on December 31, 2015 at 3:05pm
I don't have any interest in first-name only autographs either, unless it's Madonna ;0) I've actually seen several McCartney cuts go for over $750, but I wouldn't even pay $300 for just his first name.
Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on December 31, 2015 at 12:12pm
I think it is probably okbut what seems strange to me is that he was still signing much fuller signatures in 1993, and not just a line after the McC as he has done over the last decade.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service