We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Here's a signed poster that I'm sure most of you guys have already seen.It was sold on rr a while back and more recently on iconic.The first picture is of the piece in its original untouched condition.the second picture is of the same piece with major restoration work to it.The owner was asking me if I was Interested in buying it.With that kind of work done to a piece such as this,should I totally pass on it.How much can this effect the value?

Views: 4776

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yep, me too. Offer 7 and if they say no see what they come back at you with.
The restorer needs to by kicked up the backside if mc has doodled johns face.
He wanted 6000pds I offered 4500 pds ,he came back with 5300 pds.I'm assuming I can get him down to 5000 pds.that's about 7300 us.I'm gonna go a little lower and offer an even 7000 us.Dont know why the doodle was taken off if it was Maccas.
The restorers should be offering same kind of document on the work they do with posters etc because it would he nice to know if they have brushed the sigs up.
That would be great.like a complete discription of work performed.I'm this case
It looks like they didn't need to touch the sigs.

In the world of easel painting, this sort of thing would be a big no-no. Restoration, in-painting, etc. must not only be readily apparent but fully reversible. The doodle should have been left obviously. "Charm" has been removed, like dipping a coin too often. I appreciate the work - I once saw an X-Men #1 torn in clean half fully restored with rice paper, acrylic emulsion, acrylics in pigment, water and cotton balls. The reveal was the weight.

Eric

If you paid thousands of dollars for beatles lp and found out it had been restored, you'd flip your lid.

Not with a UV light. Restoration like that would be returned by me unless clearly detailed, and then I would not want it. Aristotle Contemplating the Bust of Homer by Rembrandt in the Met - 1/4 of that is by another hand (lower left). Retrato de Juan Pareja, by Diego Velázquez, has about 2 inches revealed from an old fold-over on the right and bottom edges. It is still quite visible unless at some distance.

Eric

Ooops, I said "restored" myself! That X-Men #1 was enhancement if there ever was such as thing.

Eric

I put forward that some of these 20th century MOVIE AND MUSIC pieces will take their place inside the fine art world. In this world,  some of the greatest art,like   the Cistine chapel , venus de milo, Picasso; da vinci,  and many other greats at auction are routinely restored and it is usually considered added value. But it has to be done by experts requiring a hands on viewing- SO buy the piece  with the right to return after a visual inspection.

But it seems like the Lennon words are much bolder--that indicates alteration of the the signature and that is no good.

I have heard of Beatles signatures being transferred somehow from elsewhere and re-adheared to  a Sgt. Pepper Album. This horrifies me because it destroys the piece where the signtures originally came from and also the newly applied signatures on Sgt Pepper album are not what the Beatles minds were thinking when the signatures were WRITTEN. 

The Sgt p, was Lizzie bravos she cut two signatures out and gave them to her friend, then got them back years later and had the album restored,

It's an interesting topic, I believe posters are the big restoration item, almost every dealer does this now. Rockaway records has replaced a back cover of a Beatles signed lp, it should still be on their website.

Hi Sling,

They have, but anything beyond cleaning is not made invisible. There are strict guidelines for conservation/restoration - specific formulas and mixes. The real fun is happening now, that acrylics are not quite what they were supposed to be.

Eric

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service