Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on February 29, 2016 at 8:32pm

I agree this is a real Plant autograph for sure.However in my opinion ,the other sigs don't compare to this real one at all.They look way off.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on February 29, 2016 at 8:34pm

The last 2 (the two in one scan) are nothing like the others posted at the start of this thread IMO. It appears the last 2 are authentic.

Eric

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on February 29, 2016 at 10:28pm

Dennis,

Here's a discussion from 2015 about Robert Plant's current signing habits, with a few autographs on page 2. The two people who got them signed said if he signed, he only personalized them. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule, but I've heard that before.

Here's the discussion:

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/robert-plant-recent-...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on February 29, 2016 at 10:31pm

Here's another discussion with a genuine Plant in one of the replies signed in about 2011, posted by Terrier. The Plant in the original post is not one most of us considered authentic.

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/robert-plant-signature

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dennis Williams To Steve Cyrkin, Admin on March 1, 2016 at 2:31pm

Thank you Steve for the info. Much appreciated.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page