Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 18, 2016 at 3:50pm

Looks like a forgery.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 18, 2016 at 5:39pm

I'm on the fence on this one. It has positive attributes. It could be real, but it's not a slam dunk.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcelo dias on June 19, 2016 at 1:16am

Thank you both for your answers. So it is not necessary that I ask Roger Epperson ?
Gracias

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on June 19, 2016 at 2:15am

It's not one that I'm comfortable with.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Marcelo dias on June 19, 2016 at 3:32am

Thank you for making me save my money ;)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 19, 2016 at 5:37pm

Marcelo, I think yours may actually be authentic. Compare the one you posted to this one pre-certified at RR.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.png, 4.4 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 19, 2016 at 5:44pm

Now, I like this one that was pre-certified, but personally, I'm not at all certain that all of those are authentic. Those rushed examples look nothing like his neater signatures. Personally, I wouldn't touch one of the "rushed" signatures.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 19, 2016 at 5:51pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 19, 2016 at 5:58pm

It's not an exact match, but no two signatures are.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 19, 2016 at 6:05pm

Where in the day where you need to tie the signature to some provenance, well that's my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 19, 2016 at 6:15pm

I agree with you about that, Paul. I really like to know the history of the autograph if at all possible.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on June 19, 2016 at 6:22pm

Sometimes it gets lost to time, but you may figure it out for example when Prince started to sign the P or the symbol.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page