John Lennon & Paul McCartney authentic?

Hi all! Just wondering if anyone could weigh in as to the authenticity of these signatures. At first glance they looked okay to me but I'd like to see what everyone here thinks. Thanks in advance!

Tags: McCartney, Paul

Views: 723

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 27, 2016 at 10:43am

I agree with Ballroom, I do not like either of these.

Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 27, 2016 at 6:05pm
Thanks Terrier!
Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on July 27, 2016 at 10:54am
Definitely not real.
Permalink Reply by James Stone on July 27, 2016 at 2:26pm

Without even considering the signatures it's a later form of Lennon's auto, how likely would it be to take an index card, get it to Lennon and Mccartney? Obviously post Beatles stuff exists but, to me, it is a red flag right from the jump.

Permalink Reply by Ryan on July 27, 2016 at 6:04pm
That's a really great point! I didn't really have a chance to reflect on it, certainly going to try and get my cash back. Thanks!
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 27, 2016 at 6:51pm
The McCartney is a mix of characteristics ranging from the early 1960s to the 1990s...plus some missing genuine characteristics seen in all years. It's highly unlikely he would ever sign an autograph anything like that.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service