Rich's Discussions (8,529)

Search Forum

View

Discussions Replied To (8012) Replies Latest Activity

"Well, if it's from the 80's, then it's certainly not an early Hank autograph."

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to Questionable Hank Aaron?

 10 Oct 15, 2013
Reply by Ian Baldock

"If that was an early, early Hank Aaron, that ball probably wouldn't look nearly as p…"

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to Questionable Hank Aaron?

 10 Oct 15, 2013
Reply by Ian Baldock

"Absolutely true.  But if I thought their accuracy was anywhere near 100% (or even 85…"

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to PSA get it totally wrong again

 85 Jan 13, 2017
Reply by Rich

"I never used the word "destroying."  I said "damage," and that's a fair term to use…"

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to PSA get it totally wrong again

 85 Jan 13, 2017
Reply by Rich

""It's also a joke for people to think PSA/DNA or JSA know every single autograph of…"

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to PSA get it totally wrong again

 85 Jan 13, 2017
Reply by Rich

"I'm not making that statement solely based on the case of a couple of Hulk Hogan aut…"

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to PSA get it totally wrong again

 85 Jan 13, 2017
Reply by Rich

"I disagree.  Many people hold these companies in very high regard and will buy autog…"

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to PSA get it totally wrong again

 85 Jan 13, 2017
Reply by Rich

"Eight months later, zero action taken apparently. "

Rich replied Oct 15, 2013 to Questionable NFL Autographs: Raceworld.com

 10 Oct 15, 2013
Reply by Rich

"This seller in question is either a forger or getting his inventory from a forger. …"

Rich replied Oct 9, 2013 to Opinions on Ebay seller gjacqui-2012

 11 Mar 9, 2014
Reply by Sara Kean

"Sorry, but those signatures are pretty decidedly fake.  None of those is really even…"

Rich replied Oct 7, 2013 to Star Wars cast photo: real or no.

 11 Oct 9, 2013
Reply by trent collicott

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service