Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by EjsWurhl on January 15, 2012 at 11:06am

Chris are you sure this was passed by PSA?  This looks horrible to me.  Young looks too short and the Bruce looks shaky.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 029r4yc06b4rr on January 15, 2012 at 4:46pm

Hi Eli, yes this is definetly passed by psa, the picture just isnt big enough to show the sticker. Yeah these are 100% typical signatures of them. Actually the signatures are of Angus Young and Brian Johnson. Kinda looks like Bruce as he signs compact. Buy yeah im positive these are real. They match perfectly with every IP sig iv ever seen of them. Thanks for the interest though.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 029r4yc06b4rr on January 15, 2012 at 5:11pm

I can give the sticker number if you wish, but these come from my personal collection, so they definetly have been passed by psa, lol. Youngs signature is indeed more compact than it used to be when he first started signing. But this is the signature you will get from him today as i have gotten him in person once too in the past few years. He sometimes will sign big and wide but that is typicaly if you catch him on the street and he doesnt have anything below the sig to steady it. But i have seen a few authentic examples where he will do the same sitting down, but that isnt the norm. Forgers actually make that mistake pretty commonly from what i have seen. They cant get his name compact like it should be in now adays while maintaining consistent flow. So i always watch out for that. As far as Brian, this is his typical modern signature with no deviation. I was shocked that you thought it looked shaky so i got out the original picture and even zoomed in on my pic and i really dont follow you. It actually looks rock steady with no shakiness at all. But each to his own. I can assure you though that this is his typical signature and that these are authentic. If you google Brian Johnson or Angus Young autographs, on google images followed by psa or jsa, you will get some great modern examples of their signatures. And they all match dead on to mine. But i do appreciate the interest. I dont always know certain autographs and signatures very well, so when i do have one that i know well i enjoy the occasions when i get to explain it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Carl Cox on January 15, 2012 at 6:22pm

Chris your Auto is fine, however i do not like the one my friend here Thulsadoom posted (sorry bro), but i have already discussed that with him and we have a side bet on it that involves ball hockey and surfing on the North Shore.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on January 7, 2012 at 3:11pm

I have to say that I don't think these autographs are real. I especilly dont like the Simon Wright autograph. Are they supposed to be signed 1986 or are they signed later? You can compare with the AC/DC items that I have on my homepage.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thulsadoom on January 15, 2012 at 4:55am

Thanks for the feed back, id say theese are 85 to 86,  If legit, very nice sig,s.

From my studies im sure they are good,  Hey Rodger E can you look at theese PLEESE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• ▶ Reply