We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

AFTAL Steering Committee Statement on Michael Jackson Autographs

The much awaited meeting of the new temporary AFTAL steering committee took place in Coventry on the 3rd January 2013 with the primary objective of addressing the much written about subject of Michael Jackson autographs. The committee is made up of 7 people, 2 of which are not AFTAL dealers. The former board members which included Dominic Manning stood down in order that Garry King and a new committee could then look at things afresh in an effort to resolve the ongoing problem. This new committee has been given free reign to look into and resolve the situation, and is totally free to decide how AFTAL shall move forward.

These alleged fake Michael Jackson signed items were first spotted by some people on a US forum, and quickly linked to Dominic Manning of Behind the Scenes. It was alleged that Dominic had sold hundreds of these to UK dealers via the AFTAL network. It was also suggested that Dominic had sold them as ‘in person’ signatures shortly after MJ’s passing, and had possibly sold hundreds.

It was also quickly established that the MJ’s in question had in fact been mainly purchased from another collector, Adrian Longden, who is well known amongst some US and UK in person collectors.

Adrian is not now, and never has been an AFTAL dealer, so we have very little control over whether he helps out in this matter or not, but we can confirm that he was willing to make a statement for us and spent time being interviewed by well known solicitor advocate Magnus Boyd at his London office.

After a great deal of discussion between all parties, it transpired that Adrian claimed to have obtained around 350 signed images/CD and LP covers during time spent mainly in LA.

Adrian was happy to discuss this with Magnus Boyd who AFTAL employed to both consider action because of the possible libellous accusations being made against AFTAL and its dealers, and in an effort to get an independent opinion of Adrian’s story.

Magnus Boyd confirmed to us that Adrian had confirmed to him via his witness statement that he spent a lot of time in the USA obtaining autographs, and that he believed the MJ items amounted to around 350 in total but that he did not get all of these himself in person, but rather used others, or the items were handed in to staff to be signed and collected later.

These collected items he then sold directly to various dealers and collectors both in the USA and the UK.

Adrian has given us what he considers to be an accurate breakdown of the items he sold and Magnus also considers that in his opinion his statement was both honest and truthful. Magnus also states “by putting this information in a witness statement and signing a statement of truth he was placing himself in a position where, if that statement was used in any subsequent court proceedings and Adrian was found to have been dishonest, he would be in contempt of court. Adrian’s awareness of this last point led him to take considerable care to ensure his statement was accurate.”

We still need to get accurate figures from Dominic Manning as to the number he sold here in the UK, but we expect to have this soon. We are also unsure of the exact number that Dominic obtained in person either here or in the USA, but so far it seems the number will be less than 15.

Whilst we all were very much aware that only one definitive answer and decision was only ever going to be popular and acceptable, we all went into the meeting with a totally open mind, determined to bring this matter to a conclusion, as there are many other matters also requiring our attention.

We began by viewing all the M.J. stock I ( Ken Mills ) had purchased directly from Adrian Longden, items Garry King had obtained from Dominic Manning and countless other examples of known 100% genuine ones including one I obtained myself personally in the late 1990's.

We also had quite a number of examples of MJ autographs which Roger Epperson had authenticated for R & R plus many other examples from other sources, all of which we had been very careful to include.

On viewing these many examples it was clear there were at least two variations of Michael's signature where the 'J' in Jackson either came down in more or less a straight line, or where he continued the line round into a looped 'J'.

On viewing known genuine examples it appears that both variations were used by him at different times. Some of the signed photos we have compared favourably with ones authenticated by Roger, and out of 20 examples only 2 did not make a decent match. We came to the conclusion on the day, that despite our vast combined knowledge it was almost impossible to split the autographs into two separate piles of 'genuine' and 'fake'.

Each time we thought we could see some light at the end of the tunnel someone would then point out something else that could then change our view.

Garry King had made a suggestion shortly after all this started, that it was a well documented medical fact that the use of certain drugs could affect that way in which you sign your name, and with the amounts and types of medication Michael was taking at that time this certainly seems feasible. But that suggestion was not accepted in certain quarters too well, but as we all know, if drink can affect you’re driving and certainly your handwriting then why not drugs? Surely this is something that should be considered?

Jason Thanos who is widely regarded as one of the top and most trusted In Person collectors worldwide, then suggested we view the backs of the photos to see if there was anything that might help us including dates, print numbers etc.This only showed us a letter in the corner of some which suggests they were ones taken into the house and other places. Some had the letter 'A' for Adrian in the top corners, which does suggest that those items were possibly the ones that had been taken into a house or elsewhere to be  signed and then returned later, although what we don't  know is 'who actually signed them behind closed doors'.

This tends to confirm that certain items were handed into the house Michael Jackson was using, or a member of his entourage took them in to be signed and then handed back later. It is possible that these items were then signed by another hand and therefore not obtained ‘ In Person ‘ and should not have been offered for sale as such.

It has been long established that certain stars have used a secretary for signing their fan-mail etc although this has not been widely discussed before in respect of Michael Jackson, but is this what was happening ?

If anyone in the U.S. can assist us with a possible contact either at Michael's Estate or who would be likely to help shed some light on Michael's signing habits during his last few months then please let me know and I will contact them.

Our conclusion was that it would be wrong to come to any decision on that day as we obviously needed both more time and more evidence, and we are currently making every effort to do this.

We viewed the infamous DVD which is in no way conclusive and is more of a film record of collectors specifically chasing Michael Jackson for autographs.

It does however prove beyond all doubt that Adrian Longden was in Los Angeles during the 3 month period before MJ's death, and had dialogue on a one to one basis with both MJ and his entourage as did a number of other collectors.

The numbers obtained during that period and how they were obtained became the subject of our next investigation and many AFTAL Dealers were phoned in an attempt to get numbers purchased and from where so we could more accurately examine the scale.

The DVD showed us that due to Michael's generous nature, on a number of occasions as many as 20/30 items were taken into various locations at Michael's request and brought out later with a signature on them. This confirms that there is a distinct possibility that those items were not signed by M.J. himself but by someone on his behalf.

In addition, an article in the Autograph Collector Magazine (Jan 2010) confirmed that he had become a very generous signer. “Jackson was always a generous signer and probably signed well over 100,000 autographs over his career, but in the last months of his life he took it to a new level”. “He was signing like a madman in L.A. and Las Vegas since October,” Epperson said. “If you caught him leaving tour rehearsals at Staples Center you could hand him 50 things and he’d sign them all.”

A professional collector reported, “It was the best kept secret among the pros. They really exploited the guy. Some got hundreds of items signed. They’re selling them now for $1,000-$2,000 each.

“Jackson was a sweetheart. You could knock on his limo window and hand things to his driver and Jackson would sign them in the car. These guys were handing him boxes of stuff.”

All of that of course only goes to prove that MJ did indeed sign many hundreds of items in the months leading up to his death contrary to what many had said on the forums, and we have had this confirmed by a number of other people, who have also confirmed that Adrian as well as others obtained considerable numbers of signed M.J. items during this time.

If anyone else has any categoric evidence to prove that Adrian Longden or anyone else known to him might have faked MJ's autograph, and is prepared to come forward and enlighten us, then we will be very pleased to hear from them. But in the meantime we can only surmise that the quantity that seems to be involved was more than possible to obtain.

In conclusion, we all had roughly a 500 mile round trip and spent a good 7 hours in total viewing and discussing this matter. We all felt that as a group we are neither qualified enough, nor have enough information at this time to make the decision most people had hoped for. We have listed many things we still need to do in order to continue our investigations, and have already made a start on these.

Anyone who thinks we have tried to cover up any matter relating to this investigation is perfectly entitled to their opinion, but I can assure you they could not be more wrong.

In a lot of ways it was frustrating not to have left the meeting with any solid conclusion, but all of those on the committee now know that it isn't quite as cut and dried as a lot of people had imagined.

Further meetings and investigations will continue in order to try and arrive at the truth, and we will of course keep everyone informed as and when we have something to report. I would reiterate that if anyone has any information not previously reported or supplied then we would all be glad to hear from you and your information will be dealt with in the strictest of confidence.

Views: 6654

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Roger you make is sound easy mate but it is not. I actually thought you would understand what we meant by the 2 different variations of mjs we saw , But maybe you also fancy picking an argument lol.

Seriously guys I just dont get you at times. And am been Honest if I was not there is the mix to see all this with my own eyes I would think maybe the same.

Roger can you tell me once that any of us have said we are MJ experts ?

Never !! Not once and that is not gonna change.

But lets be honest hear not supporting anyone just stating something Adrian good or bad I dont care one thing I do know for a fact is that he did obtain around 150 mjs I know this as have spoken to 3 collectors that were with him now if he has sold 500 that is a different story but I dont have the answers to that for you am not Mystic Meg with a crystal ball.

We asked for details of also some other authenticators , you suggested PSA DNA so now we are trying to sort this out , How can you guys say no one is doing anything etc.

Sometimes I dont know if there is something deeper here than what we know or not. I am very confused you ask for help and we try to help but then suddenly we are no good to help.

So who then if not us who is gonna do it for you , I dont see many people wasting their lives and time to do this crap but we are doing it for the greater good.

Seriously ? You are not been fair . I dont care what happens to who happens . It mean nothing to me at this point anyway. I know eventually am gonna start getting attacked too as this is what happens , My account on AML and my email account are been on fire I almost get emails every 2 or 3 days as some one is trying to hack them , I just had to report this as this is getting silly I am almost forgetting my passwords on my email accounts from the amount of times I have changed it.

 

 

And for the record the only people that are having fun here are the fakers , That are watching some serious and respected people arguing over this instead of all working together in a professional way to solve the problems .

 

Well said Jason. I had just finished writing my own polite response when i saw Rogers reply! I thought we were going to see some reasoned discusion with some sensible input, but instead we get that!

     

Jason,

Regarding the account change requests you're probably getting. You're not being hacked and there is no security risk. You probably signed up here using an email address known by others. People who want to cause you and others to consider quitting AML are using those addresses to have the site send forgotten password reset requests. All they need is your email address. I have asked our ISP to collect the IP addresses password change requests come from, so hopefully in a few days we'll have enough info to take action.

If you have an email address not publicly known that you can change to for AML, the notifications should stop.

Jason,

It is easy if you have the right people at the meeting.  You had MONTHS to find these people yet you  bring people that know cricket to the MJ discussion.  How did you ever think you were going to get anything accomplished?  I hope you didn't use AFTAL membership or dealers money to hold this meeting.  If you did that would be a waste of the clubs money.

Good point Roger.  I agree with you completely.  I am also sorry for Ken's loss.  The holidays are rough enough without feeling that sorta pain.

Rog,

The AFTAL member who was caught lying that a forged Queen signed album came from RR and you authenticated it was Marc Mclennan.

I agree with you, AFTAL's steering committee doesn't have the necessary experience to authenticate the Michael Jacksons, but I offered up a suggestion that may help. I hope you'll volunteer your time and expertise to it...we need you. 

Good luck on your half marathon tomorrow! LMK how it goes. 

I should have loaned you a defibrillator.

I already did help Steve.  I proved my point over and over and to absolutely no prevail.  I showed clearly what was wrong with these signatures and the folks at AFTAL disregarded it.  Now Jason admits they are no expert at MJ yet they draw the conclusion they did.  I din't know anything about George Washington so there is no way I could come to a conclusion why do they think they can.  I have my own theory on that.  This took months to come to this ridiculous conclusion by a group of people that don't even know MJ's autograph.  That is a complete and total bumble of this serious situation.  

Exactly! Since I have less faith in AFTAL than I do in Coaches Corner, I fully expect them to stand behind Adrian's material, thus stating that the opposing experts who rendered negative opinions on the material are wrong. If anyone who reads that "statement" doesn't see this happening. Well, you probably didn't read it.

After all, Adrian wrote a sworn statement. WOW!

I'm glad that the statement mentioned MJ possibly being under the influence of something when he signed at these times. This site has a group of MJ fans who know a lot about MJ's actions at the time which these were "signed" for Adrian.

The statement is a JOKE! It's simply another way to deflect. I'm sure that Garry has a "surprise" in store for everyone. He truly has to cancel out any negative opinions of his stock ( MJ, McCartney, Harrison Ford, Eastwood, etc.) especially since he billed himself as THE top expert.

Maybe he does have proof. Who will ever know though?

Roger, the Queen thing wasnt Dominic it was Marc McLennan from authenticate it

My appolgies

i find this all rather sad has any one thought about the damage to the industry this thred is doing

me im a collecter the punter the chap in the street who spends his hard earned cash the guy you need to make a living, surely people both sides of the atlantic should be pooling there resorces  instead of making petty comments  as statedthe guys in the uk have not a great idea about the jackson sigs but at least they are trying to do something about it, ok it not ideal but give these guys a chance

let me tell you jason s mission in life is to rid the world of fakers whoever they are ,and thers not a day goes by on the retro reds site that shows a football shirt thats fake and warns youdo not buy also the acaf site allso warns people of suspected fakes

keep up the good work people

and now a thought if as i suspect there are punters out there who are reading this and thinking is it worth it trying to to own a nice genuine item or shall i spend my hard earned cash in another area cause if they do  1 or 2 of you will be out of a job     alan

 

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service