Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ITguy1984 on April 10, 2020 at 4:57am

What about JSA New Jersey office. Their fee is more affordable 

I have it out BAS for quick review. Does Grad look at all BAS quick review Ruth’s that come in

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 10, 2020 at 5:33am

JSA is good. 

As far as I know Grad is shown any Ruth that isn’t obviously fake.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ITguy1984 on April 10, 2020 at 10:47am

Beckett couldn’t render an opinion. I can get a refund through PayPal. Not sure whether to pull the trigger 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by R. Tanner on April 10, 2020 at 8:09am

1933 Yankees spring training photo. The OP example paper could be in the 40's time period, though it looks like its been sprayed with a preservative. I'm curious if the signature ink matches the photo dye/ink under a black light.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 10, 2020 at 11:08am

You may be right, it may have been lacquered ages ago.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 10, 2020 at 11:24am

Itguy,

Since BAS couldn't render an opinion that relieves two of my concerns: whether it's a known preprint, and whether the look of the autograph itself is likely genuine. I think it looks right but I'm not a Ruth expert.

You probably can inspect it yourself in person and determine if its a live signature and whether or not it's lacquered. Once you're comfortable with those aspects, send it in for authentication.

If it's lacquered it's still a nice buy at $1,000 IMO.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ITguy1984 on April 11, 2020 at 7:30am

How much would lacquer lower the value.

psa targets a Ruth signed photo at $5000

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page