We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Beatles 1963 set??

Is this an authentic set?

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 31 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on March 17, 2013 at 10:11am

photo is too blurry to be certain

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on March 17, 2013 at 10:24am

Here's the item on eBay it's not a great photo!
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/281079157390?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Vestland on March 17, 2013 at 12:59pm

Looks authentic to me.....

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on March 17, 2013 at 2:04pm

They look like they can be authentic but I can just never be sure on beatles as obvs heavily forged. I thought this could be authentic as they look ok and the guy says they were obtained in person but I know in the autograph game you can't trust nobody..

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on March 17, 2013 at 3:07pm

i'm not convinced. first, again, the photo is really blurry and it could be intentional. it hides the starts and stops and slowness of a forgery.

McCartney normally used the lower extender of the "y" to form the right parenthesis in Beatles. Here he also crosses the l, not the t.

again, I'm not convinced and won't be until a better image is provided.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on March 17, 2013 at 5:47pm

Good catch, Terrier. In addition to that, the "l Mc" portion of the Paul signature look off to me, as does pretty much the entire John signature. Also, what is that extra line in the "R" in "Ringo"? The "St" in "Starr" doesn't look right either.