Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on March 23, 2019 at 7:13am

Cannot be real because the signed 63 xmas Flexi is a reproduction it’s a fake, The forger has aged the flexi cover 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jimbo on March 23, 2019 at 7:38am

I was in contact with the seller of this flexi prior to it being in auction.  I asked for opinions here and got none. 

Besides Epperson now giving it the OK with the auction house it was also personally looked over by Paul Wane of Tracks who also gave it the thumbs up.  

I know nothing of the other items.  

Im more annoyed I never pushed the boat out for it. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on March 23, 2019 at 6:58pm

How can they be genuine when the xmas flexi their on is a reproduction from 90’s it’s laughable 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on March 24, 2019 at 4:51pm

Here is the same forger again on eBay now

 https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/The-Beatles-Autographs-Signed-Single-Pag...

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• F920BFD6-F10B-4193-8742-1AE302E5114A.png, 1.4 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on March 31, 2019 at 10:46am

Why do you think he is a forger?  You don't think those Beatles sigs on eBay are real? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ryan on March 31, 2019 at 1:15pm

I don’t like the ones on eBay. George is unlike anything else I’ve seen and Ringo’s doesn’t date with the others (looks a couple of months earlier in 63). 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on April 1, 2019 at 1:00pm

The same forger who as done them all, the pictures above and on eBay. 

Look at George’s on 63 xmas Flexi repro and compare it to the set on eBay 

i think they’ve all been traced 

• ▶ Reply