Beatles set??

What's the thoughts on this set guys?

Views: 798

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 19, 2013 at 7:06pm

Not authentic, in my opinion.

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on September 19, 2013 at 8:04pm

nope, does not make the grade.

Permalink Reply by spaceman on September 19, 2013 at 8:37pm

I would say they are fake but could be past off to the uninformed as real. Not a bad attempt.

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on September 20, 2013 at 1:18am

Good attempt! The George is good...would probably have me fooled.

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 20, 2013 at 1:30am

I don't think so...not bad though...pretty good attempt...

Permalink Reply by Beatleworld on September 20, 2013 at 5:30am

That's the best looking fake George I've ever seen, could it be real ???

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on September 20, 2013 at 5:57am

yeah i thought that. Perhaps all George examples again?

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on September 21, 2013 at 12:24pm
Interesting thanks for all comments though guys
Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on September 21, 2013 at 1:28pm

No. I've seen lots of examples without. Don't think there are any rules as such with this.

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 21, 2013 at 1:52pm

I don't think that any of these were signed by George. George was good at signing for the other Beatles, but he wasn't THIS good.

Permalink Reply by spaceman on September 22, 2013 at 6:57pm

Looking at these again. It could be our friend in the UK who's mother left him all of those autographs and programmes. He used the stained paper trick. His were good fakes. The old garage sale story and low start on the bidding.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service