Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Adrian Cowdry on April 12, 2016 at 2:11am

I can help - do you have an image?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on April 12, 2016 at 2:47am

Go to this page on the forum and ask him for an opinion, he may be able to help you out.  http://live.autographmagazine.com/profile/wwwTheCEADcom  (leave a note on his wall directing him to this discussion)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adrian Cowdry on April 12, 2016 at 3:10am

OK, so without actually handling the still/photo - on this picture I would be happy to say it was genuine.

It doesn't appear to be a restrike - in fact most studio portraits were not re struck...1949 - Karloff was aging they would use this for two years at most...and then produce another portrait.

The autograph looks nice but it is possible that it was his wife who signed it...Karloff had arthritis and found it painful to sign - his wife would do a lot and I am saying this because the Karloff signatures I have seen often are not dated - his wife and secretarials would do this. This does look more like his wife's signing. She did manage a great copy of his sig.

• ▶ Reply