Hallo everybody, this is Tommy from Italy.

It's my very first post here.

I recently acquired an 8x10 photo of Charlie Watts inscribed to a guy named Thomas. I think it's close enough to be considered inscribed to me!

To me they both look 100% authentic, but the one I'm keeping (inscribed to Thomas) has 2004 in full numbers, while Charlie used to write just the last two digits. However, I've been able to find other 2 signed photos from 2004 and he did it the same way with full digits.

Also the squiggle after the "B" (ok, it's not a B, but it looks like) is a little bit loose, but the direction of the marker and the overall movement of the signature is good.
I'd say the same for "To Thomas, Charlie and 2004", comparing to others.

May I ask your opinion, please?

Thanks!

TOMMY

Tags: Charlie, Rolling, Stones, Watts

Views: 207

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

No suggestions on this one?

Thanks

:(

They look like his typical mail responses which are supposedly good.

Thanks man! :)

Hi and welcome Tommy,

No sales are allowed in this Forum. Please use the Private Messenger funtion. Thank you.

Thanks Eric, I didn't know that. I will modifity the post in a blink of an eye.

Thanks Tommy :)

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service