There are certain papers and sources to be avoided. Among them, in my opinion and that of others, Is "andy peters."  If you are considering buying a Bowie, I strongly urge you to seek an item with a sales history predating this nonsense, perhaps 2012, 2010, 2013. And with no connection to "andy peters." Read the threads, do your diligence. I have been receiving far too many emails about this material recently. Just in the last two weeks. It is alarming. As far as I know, this battle was fought and won a few years ago. As far as I know, folks do not refund $50,000+ dollars worth of material that would be evidence in an ACTIVE lawsuit. To refund is to admit as far as I can see. I know one thing - people do not leave you holding a genuine signed David Bowie self portrait after refunding you. I am running out of things to say. The information is there. Take it. There is precedent for this model. Duncan yo-yo's. Remember that brand? Eagles fly high? Really? Why are these papers not accepted by any auction house now? Did everyone get something signed for RCA or EMI executives? That is what I hear. Really?

I stand up for the legacy of David Bowie.