We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.

Need Roger Epperson or Lea Frydman to authentic this piece...Please!!!!!!Elvis Presley inscribed and autographed 8x10 RCA promotional photo. Real??

I have a Elvis Presley autograph and inscribed 8x10 RCA promotional photo, the back of photo is stamped RCA VICTOR several times, purchased this item several years ago...real or fake? I say its authentic, but i`am not a autograph authenticator , need your expert opinions. thanks! Jake.

0 members like this

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Brian M. Wazac on November 29, 2012 at 4:29pm

Isn't the 'vis' in Elvis suppose to like a lower case 'm'? Anyone else think the top auto maybe a pre-print? And if it is, the top style should be of a pre 1959. Right?

Permalink Reply by JAKE JONES on November 29, 2012 at 7:48pm

Help!!!!!!!! need Roger Epperson or Lea Frydman to authenticated this piece....please! going bananas with thing about this break in his signature and lower case and pre-print kind of malarky!!!! All i got to say is i really beleive its "AUTHENTIC", there i said it.....geezzzz!!!!!!

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on November 29, 2012 at 8:59pm

Roger only charges 15 dollars for a quick opinion on your Elvis. Just go to his website and you will find the link for that service. That is how i would approach it as i doubt he will opine for free.

Permalink Reply by JAKE JONES on November 29, 2012 at 9:32pm

I thought that what this site was all about?? Free authentication opinions!!!

Permalink Reply by Carl Ryan on November 29, 2012 at 11:03pm

You are right for the most part. But when you ask for opinions here, typically they are coming from collectors who are very educated, not normally authenticators. As afterall that is what they are paid to do.

Permalink Reply by JAKE JONES on November 30, 2012 at 2:38pm

Thanks Carl.

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 30, 2012 at 12:19am

Brian is talking about the top left signature being preprinted, so don't worry about that. I think he's likely right but I'm not familiar with all the preprints. It's an earlier style autograph than the one in green, which looks to me like it was signed around 1959.

I see what Terrier is talking about but I would be very surprised if this wasn't good. Roger's the man, tho, and worth $15 for an online opinion.

Permalink Reply by JAKE JONES on November 30, 2012 at 5:18am

Thanks Steve, i will go to Roger and get his opinion, for $15.00, i`ll get the answer i`am looking for.

Permalink Reply by Brian M. Wazac on November 30, 2012 at 10:33am

Sorry Jake, Didnt mean anything negative, just trying to help & add to the discussion.

Permalink Reply by JAKE JONES on November 30, 2012 at 2:45pm

No problem Brian, thanks for the insight! I strongly felt it was authentic, and the small matters on the autograph was getting me to wonder if i was wrong. All is good, i appreciate your concern on details. Thanks!

Permalink Reply by Brian M. Wazac on November 30, 2012 at 7:09pm

Of course Jake. Any fan of E is a friend of mine! LOL

Permalink Reply by Brian M. Wazac on December 3, 2012 at 10:35am

Any time Jake! & No harm, No foul...