Few group photos - Ringo, Paul, John, George - real or fake?

Hi. I've found some autographed photos after my deceased father and I was wondering whether they are genuine? Second photo looks like preprint to my amateur eyes, but am not sure what to think about first and third.

Views: 463

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John Spillane on December 30, 2018 at 1:38pm

Put their names in the heading and you're more than likely to get comments. If you just put in real or fake, you're going to be ignored.

Permalink Reply by fab432 on December 30, 2018 at 1:57pm

Ok the first and third photos have “autopen” signatures which are nice but not hand signed. The third photo is a nice photo from the “Revolution” era and these are rarer than the early auto penned photos. The 2nd photo has pre printed signatures.

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on December 30, 2018 at 1:59pm

Second is pretty questionable. Others are pre-prints. 

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 30, 2018 at 2:38pm

I believe the second one was signed on their behalf by Neil Aspinall.

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on December 30, 2018 at 4:04pm
The 1st and last pics are first name autopens....the pic from 1969 looks to be by Neil Aspinall...none are genuine...
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 30, 2018 at 4:18pm

Yes, first and third are autopens. Neil Aspinall Beatles signatures are considered collectible and do have value.

Permalink Reply by Lubos on December 31, 2018 at 2:18am

Oh. That's a pity. Thank you very much for your help, everyone. 

Permalink Reply by Lubos on December 31, 2018 at 5:30am

Oh. That's a pity. Thank you very much for your help, everyone. 

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service