We're expanding and reorganizing our discussion forums. Excuse our dust.
What do people think about Halo's Collection in general as possibly being reputable or not? I notice for the numerous items they have, they have few valid COA's (JSA, PSA), and there are some dubious ones (there was a post about that before).
There seems to be a deleted reddit post that claims the seller is a conman, but says nothing else (deleted).
There are some items I am interested in, but I have had some concerns about this seller.
Thoughts?
Tags:
I know of this seller - stay away. Bad "Bowie", many bad "Gleason's"...and he knows it. "Lugosi' and more. I have posted many thi8ngs here already in other threads. Here is one:
One additional and very revealing note re this seller - this source is selling a stated Gleason secretarial in the same hand as their "authentic" Gleason SP's for $225 - $25 over what is being asked for one of their "authentic" secretarials/forgeries (ranging from $200 to $350). They have FIVE up (including the "secretarial for $225) - who has 5 Gleason signatures at once? Were any of these signed photographs authentic the value would be north of $650 easily...especially for 1970's/80's examples which you just do not see, 5x7 or 8x10. 1950's are actually considerably easier to source...
A Lugosi SP and a Garland SP, both in green ink, with the same label applied to each? The "Lugosi" label mentions the divorce to Lillian. That was July 1953...the "Garland" label mentions the divorce to Sid Luft. That was in May 1965. When were these "signed"? Seller should be in Denmark from the smell of things. Lugosi died in '56,. Garland in '69...same typewriter/font, format and perhaps the same green ink (also seen on the "Lugosi" cut) on both? The Garland label tie-in is lethal IMO.
© 2026 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.