Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 24, 2012 at 8:19pm

As long as there are solid similar exemplars, sure. But who would want it except someone putting together a collection of variants? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on July 25, 2012 at 5:01pm

unlike the Lennon in a previous post, there is not one redeeming feature that I see with this signature. nothing. At least with the Lennon, even though it was non-typical, there were several positive characteristics.  this could have been signed by my dog.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James Wymer on July 24, 2012 at 11:22pm

Maybe it is it's own exemplar. That is uglier than 99% of the forgeries.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by CEE GEE on July 25, 2012 at 4:29am

Yeah buddy....this thing again....this should not have past if it is in fact authentic...what a horrific auto...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bill Morris on July 25, 2012 at 8:05pm

If it is authentic I pity the kid who scuffed up Dad's treasure. I can't tell for sure but it looks like the scuff mark came after the ball was signed. Always pays to keep extra used baseballs around for Junior to play with.

• ▶ Reply