We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Here’s one from a great actor who sadly died at a young age (39). While it has the general appearance of his signature, what’s throwing me off is the way the ‘d’ at the end is disconnected from the rest, which is atypical, and the connected flourish at the end, which again is atypical. My only thought is it is connected but the pen ran dry there, just like it appears to run dry try to connect the two parts of the ‘d’??

Views: 432

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

the OP is signed on the back. I still have the feeling of a rushed autograph that he signed at the canteen or the many war bond tours he did. the thousands of autographs he rushed to please the crowds.

Psa - no leaning "i"

maybe I am saying it wrong, the upstroke on the i points to the e

No, I see it.

Tbh, no left leaning ‘oh’ in either example?

These are early/rushed, those left leans are on page 1. I really don't care for the OP image. Seller has problems as well. I'd search for a better example Greg.

Another:

Image 1 - John Garfield (d. 1952) signed autograph auto 4.5x4.5 cut Hollywood Actor BAS

OP is odd man out in my view.

Eric, We won't always agree, we only can try to change each others opinions thru discussion and what we see. It is always about the ink.

Hi David,

I'm not trying to change your opinion - I am just hoping Greg chooses a better example. Much of the sellers modern material appears same hand.

I’m actually starting to lean toward real thanks to both of you...I think the OP has the i leaning to the e as David says, and it also has the left leaning ‘oh’ as Eric says, but if you notice it’s the top of the ‘o’ that leans to the left whenever he tries to make a complete circle of an O. But whenever it’s very rushed and he starts the O and goes right into the H is when the H leans to the left.

Here are a couple quick comparisons of the OP with the signed contract...you will notice the ‘oh’ are exact, as well as the ‘arfiel’ 

That is not exact or close to it. These photos show the opposite to me. Avoid. There are so many observable differences just in what you posted. Look at the shape and formation of that "J", look at the "a" and "r" connector, the slant of the "fie"...

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service