We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hi everyone!

Would appreciate your help with this Keith, looks like it would been signed in 2012 if I see the inscription correctly.

Do you think it's any good?

Thanks for helping!

Views: 663

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't think this is right.

Thanks Richard, hopefully other will also help out.

Seller used to be on here not sure if he still is?

No, he's not active here anymore. But I have contacted him, hopefully he'll reply soon.

But I would still appreciate to hear other members opinion!
Would really appreciate more opinions om this one!

It comes from a dealer who says that he got this in-person in London 2012. I have bought from him before and all those have always been authentic, but every autograph should "speak for themselves"...
I don't like this either Jan. I think the later autographs of his can be hard to authenticate. if I was you I would try to hunt down an early, more vintage signature of his. That's just my opinion though :)

Thanks Rob. 

I don't know what to think about this one. The dealer (he´s even a UACC registered one) says that he got it in-person. I guess this is one for Roger Epperson if I decide to try to buy it...

It has some characteristics that are different than what I look for on a Keith Richards. Whether it's good or not I can't say for sure, but I'd look for one that's more typical of his autograph.

Thanks Steve, appreciate your help!

I agree with both you and Rob, ideally it would be better with a more typical older type of his signature. But the "problem" with this is that if genuine, it has a REALLY good price...

I´ll give this a serious thought and will contact Roger Epperson if I decide to move forward with this one. If I do, I will post his opinion here!

Excellent idea, Jan.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service